A Study on Rational Polarization by Philosopher Kevin Dorst
In recent years, political divisions have been increasingly highlighted and debated, often leading to disagreement and unrest. But how do these political differences come about? In a study by philosopher Kevin Dorst, he explains how political differences can result from a process of “rational polarization”.
In the study, Dorst argues that the process of rational polarization can occur when “two political camps hold conflicting moral values and beliefs that cannot be resolved or reconciled”. He explains that in this situation, the two camps may be inclined to form opposing views, which can lead to increased political polarization. This process of rational polarization can be further strengthened by the presence of “in-groups” and “out-groups”. Dorst believes that in-groups are likely to be further apart from one another than out-groups, and that these groups can be used to reinforce moral values and beliefs.
Furthermore, Dorst believes that rational polarization can be exacerbated by extremists on both sides of the political divide. By engaging in extreme behavior, these individuals can make it more difficult for other individuals to come to an agreement, or even to engage in dialogue. This can lead to a situation where political differences become entrenched, making it difficult to bridge the gap between opposing sides.
Dorst also explores how social media can be used to further increase the process of rational polarization. He argues that, in the modern age of social media, individuals are able to find like-minded individuals more easily than ever before. This can lead to a situation where individuals are more likely to engage in extreme behavior, and where a lack of dialogue between opposing sides can further exaggerate differences.
Finally, Dorst believes that in order to reduce the effects of rational polarization, it is necessary to understand the process itself. He argues that it is important to recognize that political differences can be rooted in moral values and beliefs, as well as in-groups and out-groups. He believes that it is also important to remember that extremists on both sides of the political divide can further exacerbate differences, and that social media can play a role in increasing the process of rational polarization.
In conclusion, Kevin Dorst’s study provides an important insight into the process of rational polarization, and how it can lead to increased political divisions. He argues that in order to reduce the effects of rational polarization, it is important to recognize the underlying factors that can contribute to it. Through understanding the process of rational polarization, individuals can work together to bridge the gap between opposing sides and build a more inclusive society.
