Hunter Biden, Gun Rights Advocate? Says Charges Against Him Are Unconstitutional Violation Of Second Amendment
Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President Joe Biden, is making headlines again, this time for his legal battle against gun charges. On Monday, his attorneys argued in federal court that the charges should be dismissed due to an unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment.
The case began in October 2019 when Hunter Biden was arrested in Delaware for possession of a firearm by a person prohibited. He was charged with a felony and faced up to 10 years in prison.
However, Hunter Biden’s attorneys argued that the charges should be dismissed because they violate the Second Amendment. They argued that the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms and that the charges against Hunter Biden are an unconstitutional infringement on that right.
The attorneys also argued that the charges are based on an outdated law that was passed in the early 1990s and is no longer applicable. They argued that the law was passed before the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which established an individual right to bear arms.
The attorneys argued that the charges against Hunter Biden are an unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment and should be dismissed. They also argued that the charges are based on an outdated law that is no longer applicable.
The judge has yet to make a ruling on the case, but the arguments made by Hunter Biden’s attorneys have sparked a debate about gun rights and the Second Amendment.
Many gun rights advocates have come out in support of Hunter Biden, arguing that the charges against him are an unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment. They argue that the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms and that the charges against Hunter Biden are an infringement on that right.
On the other hand, gun control advocates argue that the Second Amendment does not protect the right to bear arms in all circumstances. They argue that the Second Amendment does not protect the right to possess a firearm if the person is prohibited from doing so.
No matter which side of the debate you are on, it is clear that the case of Hunter Biden has sparked a debate about gun rights and the Second Amendment. It will be interesting to see how the judge rules on the case and what implications it will have for gun rights in the future.
In the meantime, Hunter Biden’s attorneys have made a strong case for why the charges against him should be dismissed. They have argued that the charges are an unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment and should be dismissed. It remains to be seen how the judge will rule on the case, but it is clear that the arguments made by Hunter Biden’s attorneys have sparked a debate about gun rights and the Second Amendment.
