Republican Congressman Jason Smith from Missouri recently made headlines when he questioned the need for banning Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from being present at polling places ahead of the midterm elections. During an appearance on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” he raised a valid point about the role of ICE in ensuring the integrity of our electoral system. His statement, while seemingly controversial, brings to light the crucial issue of illegal voting and the importance of protecting the democratic process.
Smith’s argument stems from the fact that the presence of ICE at polling places serves as a deterrent for those who are not legally allowed to vote in the United States. In a country founded on the principles of democracy and fairness, it is crucial to ensure that only eligible citizens exercise their right to vote. And as a government agency tasked with enforcing immigration laws, it is only fitting that ICE be present at polling places to prevent any illegal voting.
According to the Pew Research Center, there are approximately 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants living in the United States. While this number has declined in recent years, it is still a significant population that could potentially influence the outcome of an election if given the opportunity to vote. This is why ICE’s presence at polling places is crucial in preventing any sort of electoral fraud.
Furthermore, it is important to note that the role of ICE goes beyond just immigration enforcement. In 2018 alone, the agency made over 1,900 arrests for crimes such as human trafficking, drug trafficking, and violent crimes. These are serious offenses that can greatly impact the safety and well-being of American citizens. By banning ICE from being present at polling places, we are essentially limiting their ability to carry out their duties and protect our communities.
Smith’s stance on this issue has received backlash from some who believe that ICE’s presence at polling places may intimidate or discourage eligible voters from exercising their right to vote. However, this concern can easily be addressed by ensuring that ICE agents conduct themselves in a professional and non-intrusive manner while at these locations. The presence of law enforcement at any public event, including polling places, should not be seen as a source of fear or intimidation. Rather, it should provide a sense of security and protection.
Furthermore, it is important to note that the responsibility of ensuring the integrity of our elections does not solely fall on the shoulders of ICE. State and local election officials also play a crucial role in verifying the eligibility of voters and preventing any sort of fraud. Therefore, the presence of ICE at polling places should not be seen as a means to solely deter illegal voting, but rather as a collaborative effort in upholding the principles of fair and democratic elections.
Some may argue that banning ICE from polling places is a necessary step in promoting inclusivity and equality. However, it is crucial to distinguish between the rights of citizens and the rights of non-citizens in this matter. While we strive to provide a warm and welcoming environment for everyone in our country, it is important to uphold and protect the rights of those who are legally allowed to vote.
In conclusion, Rep. Jason Smith’s question on why ICE should be banned from polling places raises valid concerns about the integrity of our electoral system. With the upcoming midterm elections, it is more important than ever to ensure that only eligible citizens are allowed to vote. The presence of ICE at polling places serves as a necessary deterrent to prevent any sort of illegal voting and to uphold the integrity of our democracy. As citizens of this great nation, it is our responsibility to support measures that promote fair and secure elections.
