In today’s political climate, criticism is common and often expected. However, when that criticism comes from a fellow elected official, it can create division and undermine the goal of serving and representing the people. This was the case when ESPN commentator and host of “Straight Shooter with Stephen A.”, Stephen A. Smith, recently blasted Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) for her criticism of President Trump.
During a Wednesday episode of “Straight Shooter with Stephen A.”, Smith questioned Rep. Crockett’s motives and wondered how her criticism of President Trump would benefit her constituents. He stated, “However Jasmine Crockett chooses to express herself, I’m like, is that gonna help your district in Texas? Aren’t you there to serve and make a difference for the people who elected you?”
While it is understandable that Smith may have his own disagreements with Rep. Crockett’s criticism, his comments raise an important question – are elected officials solely responsible for their districts or should they also use their platform to speak out on larger issues affecting the nation?
Rep. Crockett’s district in Texas is predominantly Democratic and consists of a diverse population. The people in her district did not elect her solely to represent their interests, but also to speak up for issues that affect the entire country. As an elected official, it is her responsibility to use her voice and platform to advocate for her constituents as well as for the greater good.
In today’s political landscape, it is necessary for elected officials to have a strong stance on issues and to speak out when they see injustices occurring. As an African American, Rep. Crockett is no stranger to discrimination and has been vocal about speaking up for marginalized communities. In fact, her criticism of President Trump stems from his controversial and often discriminatory policies and actions.
Furthermore, as a member of the Texas House of Representatives, Rep. Crockett has a duty to hold the President accountable for his actions, especially when they negatively impact the people she represents. By speaking out, she is fulfilling her responsibility as an elected official and upholding her oath to serve and protect her constituents.
Moreover, by using his platform on ESPN, Smith has a significant following and a powerful voice. Instead of using it to question Rep. Crockett’s intentions, he could have used it to encourage dialogue and bridge the gap between differing opinions. As a popular and influential figure, his words have the ability to shape public opinion and further exacerbate already existing divides.
In response to Smith’s comments, Rep. Crockett took to Twitter and stated, “I didn’t know that in 2019 the duty of every politician is to lay in front of the White House like Gandhi, and if we didn’t do that we couldn’t speak on the issues.”
Her statement highlights the absurdity of expecting elected officials to remain silent in the face of injustice and only focus on local issues. It is the duty of elected officials to amplify the voices of their constituents and speak out against issues that affect them.
Smith’s comments also speak to a larger issue of unwarranted expectations and double standards when it comes to the role of politicians. While it is crucial for elected officials to prioritize the needs of their districts, they should not be criticized for using their platform and position to speak out on larger issues.
In conclusion, it is imperative that elected officials use their voices and platforms to speak out against injustice and advocate for the people they represent. As elected officials, it is their responsibility to hold the President accountable and speak up for issues that affect the nation. Criticizing them for fulfilling their duties only serves to undermine the importance of their role in society. Instead of questioning Rep. Crockett’s criticism, we should applaud her for using her platform to make a difference and inspire positive change.
