In his latest book “Breaking the Law,” conservative journalist Alex Marlow lays out a damning case against New York Attorney General Letitia James. Marlow, the editor-in-chief of Breitbart News, provides eight clear examples that prove James had no intention of affording President Trump equal protection under the law. With the recent bombshell from the Department of Justice, Marlow’s calls for the prosecution of James for conspiracy against Trump’s civil rights have gained even more validity.
The first example that Marlow presents is James’ repeated attempts to use her office’s power to target Trump and his associates. From launching multiple investigations into his personal and business affairs to filing frivolous lawsuits, James has made it clear that her mission was to take down the former president at any cost. This goes against the core principle of equal protection under the law and shows a blatant disregard for fairness and due process.
Marlow also points to James’ statements and actions during her campaign for attorney general. She made her disdain for Trump very clear and even declared that she would use her position to “stand up” to him. This type of rhetoric only further highlights her bias and lack of impartiality. It is one thing to have personal political beliefs, but it is another to use a position of power to act on those beliefs at the expense of others’ rights.
Next, Marlow reveals the disturbing tactics used by James and her office in the investigations into the Trump Foundation and the Trump Organization. According to Marlow, James’ office engaged in unethical behavior by leaking information and documents to the media, violating grand jury secrecy rules, and targeting Trump’s family members and their businesses. These actions not only violate ethical standards but also raise questions about the legitimacy of the investigations themselves.
Marlow also sheds light on the double standard in how James handles cases involving Democrats versus those involving Republicans. For example, while James was quick to file a lawsuit against the Trump Foundation, she refused to take action against the Clinton Foundation despite numerous allegations of wrongdoing. This blatant bias not only goes against the principle of equal protection under the law but also calls into question the integrity of James’ office.
Another concerning example is James’ involvement in the collusion hoax and her efforts to undermine the Mueller investigation. Marlow argues that James, along with other Democratic officials, pushed the false narrative of Russian collusion despite knowing there was no evidence to support it. This not only wasted taxpayer dollars but also damaged the integrity of the judicial system.
Marlow also highlights James’ support for the radical defund the police movement and her use of her office to target law enforcement. By seeking to strip funding from police departments and attacking law enforcement, James has put the safety and security of New Yorkers and Americans at risk. This further demonstrates her disregard for the rule of law and her willingness to sacrifice public safety for political gain.
Furthermore, Marlow points to James’ continued involvement in the ongoing witch hunt against Trump. Despite no evidence of collusion or wrongdoing, James continues to pursue Trump and his associates, determined to take them down. This kind of personal vendetta has no place in the justice system and only serves to further politicize the office of the attorney general.
Finally, Marlow highlights James’ actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. While small businesses and individuals were struggling to survive, James chose to focus on targeting Trump and his family. This blatant misuse of resources and lack of prioritization shows where James’ true intentions lie – not with protecting the rights of all Americans, but with furthering her own political agenda.
In conclusion, Marlow’s book and subsequent call for the prosecution of Letitia James bring to light the serious violations of equal protection under the law and abuse of power by the New York attorney general. Letitia James had no intention of ever affording President Trump equal protection under the law and her actions have not gone unnoticed. It is time for justice to be served and for James to be held accountable for her actions. Only then can we begin to restore integrity and impartiality to the office of the attorney general.
