In the world of journalism, it is not uncommon for media outlets to publish sensationalized stories in order to grab attention and generate controversy. However, when a reputable publication like the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) does so, it is not only disappointing but also damaging to the credibility of the media industry. This was the case with the recent WSJ article that attempted to link President Donald Trump to the late financier and convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein.
On Friday’s “Alex Marlow Show,” host and Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow discussed the WSJ’s Epstein-Trump story, exposing the utter absurdity of the hit piece and shedding light on the true intentions behind it. The article, titled “How a Future Trump Cabinet Member Gave a Serial Sex Abuser the Deal of a Lifetime,” was published on November 29, 2019, and immediately sparked outrage and backlash.
The WSJ article claimed that in 2007, Alexander Acosta, who was then a U.S. attorney in Florida and is now Trump’s former labor secretary, gave Epstein a “sweetheart deal” by allowing him to plead guilty to lesser charges and serve only 13 months in jail. The article also insinuated that Acosta’s decision was influenced by Trump, who was a friend of Epstein’s at the time.
However, as Marlow pointed out, the WSJ conveniently left out crucial details that would have debunked their entire narrative. Firstly, the plea deal was approved by a federal judge, not just Acosta. Secondly, the decision to offer Epstein a lenient sentence was made in order to ensure that he would be held accountable for his crimes, as there was a risk that he could walk free if the case went to trial. And most importantly, there was no evidence to suggest that Trump had any involvement in the plea deal.
Marlow also highlighted the fact that the WSJ article was based on anonymous sources and lacked any concrete evidence to support its claims. This is a common tactic used by the media to spread false information and create controversy. It is a dangerous trend that undermines the integrity of journalism and erodes public trust in the media.
But what is the motive behind the WSJ’s hit piece on Trump? As Marlow explained, it is a part of the ongoing effort by the mainstream media to discredit and undermine the President. The media has been relentless in its attacks on Trump since he announced his candidacy, and this latest attempt is just another desperate ploy to tarnish his reputation.
It is worth noting that the WSJ is owned by News Corp, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch, a known critic of Trump. This raises questions about the objectivity and impartiality of the publication, as it seems to be driven by a personal agenda rather than a commitment to honest and fair reporting.
In conclusion, the WSJ’s Epstein-Trump story is a prime example of the utter absurdity and bias that plagues the mainstream media. It is a disservice to the public and a disservice to the profession of journalism. As responsible consumers of information, it is our duty to question and scrutinize the news we consume and not fall prey to sensationalized and baseless stories. And as for the WSJ, it is high time they reevaluate their journalistic standards and focus on reporting the truth rather than pushing their own agenda.
