HomeLast NewsBreitbart Business Digest: Tariffs Are Absorbed by U.S. Retailers, Not Consumers

Breitbart Business Digest: Tariffs Are Absorbed by U.S. Retailers, Not Consumers

The History of Tariffs: Debunking the Fear of Consumer Price Increases

Tariffs have been a hot topic in the world of business and politics for centuries. These taxes on imported goods have been used by governments to protect their domestic industries, generate revenue, and even as a tool for diplomacy. However, one of the biggest concerns surrounding tariffs is the fear of widespread consumer price increases. Many believe that these taxes will ultimately be passed on to the consumer, resulting in higher prices for everyday goods. But is this fear justified? Let’s take a closer look at the history of tariffs and see if initial concerns were indeed overstated.

The concept of tariffs can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where they were used to protect local industries from foreign competition. However, it wasn’t until the 19th century that tariffs became a major source of revenue for governments. In the United States, tariffs were a significant part of the country’s economic policy, with the government relying heavily on them to fund its operations. This led to a series of tariff acts, with the most notable being the Tariff of 1828, also known as the “Tariff of Abominations.”

The Tariff of 1828 sparked outrage among Southern states, as it heavily taxed imported goods that they relied on for their economy. This led to the Nullification Crisis, where South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union if the tariff was not repealed. Eventually, a compromise was reached, and the tariff was lowered. This event highlighted the power and impact of tariffs on both the economy and politics.

Fast forward to the 20th century, and tariffs continued to play a significant role in the global economy. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods, is often cited as one of the main causes of the Great Depression. This act resulted in retaliatory tariffs from other countries, leading to a decrease in international trade and worsening the economic crisis.

However, it wasn’t until the 1980s that the fear of consumer price increases due to tariffs became a major concern. During this time, Japan’s booming economy and the rise of its manufacturing industry led to a surge in imports to the United States. This resulted in the implementation of voluntary export restraints, where Japan agreed to limit its exports to the US. This move was met with criticism, with many arguing that it would lead to higher prices for American consumers. However, studies have shown that the impact on prices was minimal, with most of the cost being absorbed by the Japanese companies.

In recent years, tariffs have once again taken center stage, with the United States imposing tariffs on goods from China, Europe, and other countries. The fear of consumer price increases has once again resurfaced, with many predicting dire consequences for the economy. However, the reality has been quite different. In fact, a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that the cost of tariffs has been almost entirely absorbed by US companies, with little impact on consumer prices.

The recent Breitbart Business Digest article, “Tariffs Are Absorbed by U.S. Retailers, Not Consumers,” highlights this very fact. The article cites a report by the National Bureau of Economic Research, which found that the cost of tariffs on Chinese goods has been borne by US retailers and not passed on to consumers. This is due to the competitive nature of the retail industry, where companies are forced to absorb the cost to remain competitive in the market.

So, what does this all mean? It means that the initial fears of widespread consumer price increases due to tariffs were indeed overstated. While tariffs may have a short-term impact on prices, the long-term effects are minimal. In fact, tariffs can have positive effects on the economy, such as protecting domestic industries and creating jobs. It’s also worth noting that tariffs are not the only factor that affects consumer prices. Other factors such as supply and demand, production costs, and currency exchange rates also play a significant role.

In conclusion, the history of tariffs has shown that initial fears of widespread consumer price increases were indeed overstated. While tariffs may have a short-term impact on prices, the long-term effects are minimal, with most of the cost being absorbed by companies. As the global economy continues to evolve, it’s essential to look at the facts and not let fear-mongering dictate our views on tariffs. Let’s learn from history and

2 Mexican Navy ships laden with humanitarian aid dock in Cuba as US blockade

HAVANA (AP) - Two Mexican Navy ships laden with humanitarian aid docked in Cuba on Thursday as a U.S. blockade deepens the island's energy crisis. The ships arrived two weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened tariffs on any country selling

GOP senator, Minnesota AG clash at Capitol Hill hearing: ‘Sit there and smirk,

Republican senator accuses Keith Ellison of "despicable" smirk during heated Capitol Hill hearing over Minnesota agitators opposing ICE enforcement actions.

Homan announces Operation Metro Surge to conclude in Minnesota

Border czar Tom Homan announced an end to Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota, citing success in reducing public safety threats with state cooperation.

Biden admin skirted rules to deliver massive contract to nonprofit run by

An Inspector General report says the Biden administration's HHS agency bypassed federal procurement rules and paid far above estimates on a $529M sole-source contract for a 2,000-bed emergency site for unaccompanied minors in Texas.

Colorado judges lean left – just look at the numbers | George Brauchler

Colorado's judicial selection system is heavily skewed toward Democrats and defendants. It is time to drop the pretense that our system adequately minimizes the impact of partisan political influences on the selection of the judicial branch. In less

Bondi faces grilling in House Judiciary Committee over Epstein files,

Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee, where lawmakers are expected to confront her over the DOJ's handling of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case files.